Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 30;12(2):363. doi: 10.3390/nu12020363

Table 4.

Stool consistency profile over the intervention period.

Subjects (n, %)
Group Stool type (BSS) Day 0 Day 21 Day 42
Placebo
(n = 109)
Constipation (1–2) 25 (22.9) 19 (17.4) 28 (25.7)
Normal (3–5) 70 (64.2) 74 (67.9) 68 (62.4)
Diarrhea (6–7) 14 (12.8) 14 (12.8) 11 (10.1)
Data not available 0 2 (1.8) 2 (1.8)
L. acidophilus DDS-1
(n = 111)
Constipation (1–2) 24 (21.6) 14 (12.6) 9 (8.1)
Normal (3–5) 63 (56.8) 82 (73.9) 93 (83.8)
Diarrhea (6–7) 24 (21.6) 13 (11.7) 7 (6.3)
Data not available 0 2 (1.8) 2 (1.8)
B. lactis UABla-12
(n = 110)
Constipation (1–2) 22 (20.0) 18 (16.4) 10 (9.1)
Normal (3–5) 67 (60.9) 63 (57.3) 83 (75.5)
Diarrhea (6–7) 21 (19.1) 24 (21.8) 12 (10.9)
Data not available 0 5 (4.5) 5 (4.5)
p Value DDS-1 vs. Placebo 0.234 0.733 0.002
UABla-12 vs. Placebo 0.438 0.444 0.022
DDS-1 vs. UABla-12 0.139 0.234 0.435

Between group comparison, Pearson Chi Square test. BSS: Bristol Stool Scale.