Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 24;12(2):311. doi: 10.3390/nu12020311

Table 1.

Energy metabolism.

Normal-CON
(n = 10)
Px-CON
(n = 10)
Positive-CON
(n = 10)
SP-L
(n = 10)
SP-M
(n = 10)
SP-H
(n = 10)
Body weight gain for 8 weeks (g) 153 ± 13.1 a 76.2 ± 6.8 d 128 ± 13.2 b 109 ± 11.3 c 112 ± 10.5 c 117 ± 11.2 b,c
Food intake (g/day) 15.7 ± 1.4 16.2 ± 1.9 16.3 ± 1.5 17.2 ± 1.5 16.2 ± 1.9 16.2 ± 1.6
Food efficiency 0.17 ± 0.02 a 0.08 ± 0.01 d 0.14 ± 0.02 b 0.11 ± 0.02 c 0.12 ± 0.02 b,c 0.13 ± 0.02 b
Epididymal fat pads (g) 5.9 ± 0.7 a 2.7 ± 0.4c 4.2 ± 0.6 b 2.9 ± 0.5 c 3.0 ± 0.5 c 3.8 ± 0.5 b
Retroperitoneal fat mass (g) 6.7 ± 0.8 a 3.1 ± 0.5 d 5.6 ± 0.7 b 3.3 ± 0.6 d 4.3 ± 0.7 c 5.7 ± 0.7 b
Visceral fat (g) 12.6 ± 1.5 a 5.8 ± 0.8 d 9.8 ± 1.2 b 6.2 ± 0.9 d 7.3 ± 0.9 c 9.5 ± 1.2 b

Food efficiency: the ratio of daily energy intake/daily weight gain. Results are expressed as means ± SDs. Pancreatectomized (Px) rats fed (1) 0.5 g dextrin/kg bw (Px-CON), (2) 0.05 g acid hydrolyzed silk peptides(SPs)/kg bw (SP-L), (3) 0.1 g SPs/kg bw (SP-M), (4) 0.5 g SPs/kg bw (SP-H), and (5) 0.04 g metformin/kg bw (positive-CON) with a high fat diet. Sham-operated rats (normal-CON) fed the same diet of Px-CON. a,b,c,d Values on the same row with different superscripts were significantly different at p < 0.05.