Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 14;12(2):481. doi: 10.3390/nu12020481

Table 3.

Comparison of body composition within groups and between groups.

Values a Absolute Changes b
Calanus Placebo Calanus Placebo
(n = 27) (n = 26) (n = 27) (n = 26) r
Parameters Pre Post Pre Post Post-Pre Post-Pre
Weight (kg) 69.9 (9.3) 68.7 (8.1) 68.5 (19.3) 67.4 (18.7) * −0.1 (1.9) −1.1 (1.5) −0.208
ICW (l) 19.9 (2.5) 20.0 (3.2) 20.1 (4.1) 20.0 (4.2) 0.0 (1.1) 0.1 (2.9) 0.038
ECW (l) 12.7 (1.7) 12.8 (1.9) 12.6 (2.4) 13.0 (2.5) 0.0 (0.5) −0.1 (2.0) 0.062
Fat (kg) 26.5 (10.8) 24.5 (9.9) 23.3 (8.7) 22.0 (8.3) −1.1 (3.1) −0.7 (9.6) 0.007
Fat (%) 37.2 (7.7) 35.2 (7.8) 34.5 (10.0) 33.9 (8.4) −0.8 (3.3) −1.0 (8.0) 0.040
SMM (kg) 23.9 (3.2) 24.1 (4.1) 24.1 (5.3) 24.1 (5.5) 0.1 (1.3) 0.1 (3.4) 0.057
VFA (cm2) 114.8 (46.0) 98.2 (33.8) * 101.0 (43.0) 92.3 (45.5) −13.6 (29.3) −12.7 (27.4) 0.109
BMI (kg.m−2) 26.8 (4.9) 26.8 (4.4) 26.5 (5.9) 26.0 (5.7) * 0.0 (0.7) −0.4 (0.7) −0.197

Note: data are presented as median (IQR), * p < 0.05, a Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, b Mann–Whitney U test; r = effect size; minus prefers placebo; ICW—intracellular water; ECW—extracellular water; SMM—skeletal muscle mass; VFA - visceral fat area; BMI—body mass index.