Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 19;12(2):535. doi: 10.3390/nu12020535

Table 3.

Association between infant formulas and PLON-R clinical clusters in children at four years old.

PLON-R Scales SF (n = 46) EF (n = 43) BF (n = 33) Chi-Square P 1
Form Delayed/Need to improve 13 (28.26) 9 (20.93) 4 (12.12) 2.991 0.224
Normal 33 (71.74) 34 (79.07) 29 (87.88)
Content Delayed/Need to improve 37 (80.43) 32 (74.42) 20 (60.61) 2.991 0.142
Normal 9 (19.57) 11 (25.58) 13 (39.39)
Use Delayed/Need to improve 28 (60.87) a 14 (32.56) b 13 (39.39) a,b 7.786 0.020
Normal 18 (39.13) a 29 (67.44) b 20 (60.61) a,b
PLON-R Total Score Delayed/Need to improve 25 (54.35) a 19 (44.19) a,b 8 (24.24) b 7.188 0.027
Normal 21 (45.65) a 24 (55.81) a,b 25 (75.76) b

Data are presented as n(%). 1 p-values for overall differences between COGNIS study groups. p-values were obtained from the chi-square test for categorical variables. Values not sharing the same suffix (ab) were significantly different in the Bonferroni post hoc test. p-values < 0.05 are highlighted in bold. BF: Breastfed infants; EF: Experimental infant formula; PLON-R: Oral Language Task of Navarra-Revised; SF: Standard infant formula. Categories according to standards PLON-R: Normal (form: ≥ 50; content: ≥ 67; use: ≥ 59; total: ≥ 54) and delayed/need to improve (form: ≤ 36; content: ≤ 47; use: ≤ 39; total: ≤ 45).