Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 14;20:64. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-0914-6

Table 1.

Assessment of consideration of confounding bias in Abstracts and Discussion [26]

1. “Do the authors mention confounding using explicitly the terms “confounder(s),” “confounding,” “confound,” or do they allude to it without using those terms, or is confounding not considered at all?” [26]
2. “Do the authors mention bias using explicitly the term “bias”?” [26]
3. “Do the authors mention specific confounders that have not been adjusted for? (If yes, what were the reasons? If not, were there unspecified unmeasured confounders without specifically stating which ones?” [26]
4. “Do the authors state that their main findings are likely, possibly, or unlikely affected by residual confounding?” [26]
5. “Do the authors state that their findings need to be interpreted with caution due to confounding?” [26]
6. “Do the authors call for caution or indicate limitations or uncertainty due to possible confounding or other bias in their conclusions?” [26]