Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Mar 14.
Published in final edited form as: J Policy Anal Manage. 2019;38(2):366–393.

Appendix Table 6C.

Effect of ACA Medicaid expansions on payment source using alternative controls for between state heterogeneity: TEDS 2010-2015

Outcome: Private Medicaid Self-pay States and localities
Pre-expansion proportion in the expansion state group 0.087 0.173 0.109 0.521
Model (1) 0.015 (0.012) 0.129*** (0.036) −0.029 (0.025) −0.115** (0.045)
Model (2) 0.012 (0.015) 0.117*** (0.036) −0.021 (0.038) −0.108* (0.055)
Model (3) 0.012 (0.013) 0.114** (0.049) −0.045 (0.035) −0.081 (0.051)
N 145 145 145 145

Notes: All models estimated with OLS. Standard errors are clustered at the state level and are reported in parentheses. Model (1) controls for state demographics, state fixed effects, and period fixed effects (baseline model). Model (2) controls for state demographics, state-specific linear time trends, state fixed effects, and year fixed effects. Model (3) controls for state and year fixed effects. Payment source state sample includes the following states: AK, AR, CO, DC, HI, IA, ID, KS, KY, MO, MS, MT, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, OH, PA, RI, SC, SD, TX, UT, and VT. Standard errors are clustered at the state level and are reported in parentheses.

***;**;*

=statistically different from zero at the 1%;5%;10% level.