Table 5.
Reduction of AFB1 concentration by Lactobacillus and S. cerevisiae strains
| Strain | Time (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6 | 12 | 24 | ||
| Concentration ± SD (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | |||||
| Lactobacillus | brevis ŁOCK 1093 | 100 A | 39.56 ± 0.99 B (60) | 37.13 ± 2.04 B (63) | 32.70 ± 0.59 C (67) |
| casei ŁOCK 0911 | 51.30 ± 2.04 B (49) | 49.92 ± 1.36 B (50) | 45.13 ± 0.38 C (55) | ||
| casei ŁOCK 0915 | 67.18 ± 0.63 B (33) | 58.98 ± 1.27 C (41) | 55.80 ± 1.51 D (44) | ||
| paracasei ŁOCK 1091 | 57.44 ± 1.61 B (43) | 48.23 ± 1.27 C (52) | 42.21 ± 1.52 D (58) | ||
| pentosus ŁOCK 1094 | 44.70 ± 0.41 B (55) | 38.73 ± 1.03 B (61) | 28.96 ± 0.58 B (71) | ||
| plantarum ŁOCK 0860 | 47.93 ± 1.01 B (52) | 45.88 ± 0.88 B (54) | 40.62 ± 0.50 C (59) | ||
| plantarum ŁOCK 0862 | 35.33 ± 0.95 B (65) | 34.82 ± 0.47 B (65) | 34.30 ± 1.06 B (66) | ||
| reuteri ŁOCK 1092 | 45.19 ± 0.97 B (55) | 44.98 ± 0.60 B (55) | 43.79 ± 1.81 B (56) | ||
| reuteri ŁOCK 1096 | 40.79 ± 0.74 B (59) | 38.41 ± 1.08 C (62) | 36.02 ± 0.57 D (64) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1087 | 41.42 ± 2.34 B (59) | 40.32 ± 0.34 B (60) | 40.19 ± 1.48 B (60) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1088 | 79.65 ± 0.96 B (20) | 61.04 ± 0.88 C (39) | 44.83 ± 1.49 D (55) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1089 | 56.24 ± 0.98 B (44) | 50.43 ± 0.46 C (50) | 40.61 ± 1.58 D (59) | ||
| Average concentration (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | 50.56 (49) | 45.74 (54) | 40.43 (60) | ||
| S. cerevisiae | ŁOCK 0068 | 100 A | 46.79 ± 0.62 B (53) | 44.43 ± 1.35 B (56) | 38.07 ± 1.35 C (62) |
| ŁOCK 0113 | 53.27 ± 0.69 B (47) | 48.93 ± 1.75 C (51) | 41.45 ± 0.63 D (59) | ||
| ŁOCK 0119 | 42.25 ± 0.73 B (58) | 34.12 ± 1.05 C (66) | 31.48 ± 1.05 D (69) | ||
| ŁOCK 0137 | 34.99 ± 1.85 B (65) | 34.02 ± 2.30 B (66) | 32.70 ± 0.79 B (67) | ||
| ŁOCK 0140 | 41.55 ± 1.62 B (58) | 39.58 ± 1.42 B (60) | 35.78 ± 1.39 C (64) | ||
| ŁOCK 0142 | 33.64 ± 0.48 B (66) | 33.00 ± 1.41 B,C (67) | 32.48 ± 0.38 C (68) | ||
| Average concentration (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | 42.08 (58) | 39.01 (61) | 35.33 (65) | ||
*Values labelled by different capital letters were significantly different per analysed strain (p < 0.05)