Table 6.
Reduction of DON concentration by Lactobacillus and S. cerevisiae strains
| Strain | Time (h) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 6 | 12 | 24 | ||
| Concentration ± SD (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | |||||
| Lactobacillus | brevis ŁOCK 1093 | 100 A | 94.24 ± 0.77 B (6) | 87.52 ± 0.95 C (12) | 80.72 ± 0.33 D (19) |
| casei ŁOCK 0911 | 92.06 ± 1.10 B (8) | 84.06 ± 1.01 C (16) | 72.49 ± 0.67 D (28) | ||
| casei ŁOCK 0915 | 88.73 ± 1.85 B (11) | 81.93 ± 0.75 C (18) | 78.06 ± 1.20 D (22) | ||
| paracasei ŁOCK 1091 | 84.44 ± 1.75 B (16) | 73.75 ± 3.09 C (26) | 67.30 ± 1.46 D (33) | ||
| pentosus ŁOCK 1094 | 78.53 ± 1.19 B(21) | 72.49 ± 1.88 C (27) | 66.82 ± 0.65 D (33) | ||
| plantarum ŁOCK 0860 | 80.34 ± 0.49 B (20) | 74.12 ± 0.83 C (26) | 70.25 ± 1.01 D (30) | ||
| plantarum ŁOCK 0862 | 83.78 ± 0.20 B (16) | 78.34 ± 1.27 C (22) | 74.53 ± 1.04 D (25) | ||
| reuteri ŁOCK 1092 | 79.92 ± 1.02 B (20) | 69.05 ± 0.44 C (31) | 60.63 ± 0.59 D (39) | ||
| reuteri ŁOCK 1096 | 78.36 ± 0.30 B (22) | 70.58 ± 1.38 C (29) | 61.31 ± 1.45 D (39) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1087 | 87.85 ± 2.94 B (12) | 79.04 ± 1.13 C (21) | 75.05 ± 1.43 D (25) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1088 | 83.04 ± 2.78 B (17) | 78.14 ± 0.86 C (22) | 73.74 ± 0.30 D (26) | ||
| rhamnosus ŁOCK 1089 | 80.35 ± 0.49 B (20) | 74.01 ± 2.61 C (26) | 64.55 ± 0.70 D (35) | ||
| Average concentration (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | 84.30 (16) | 76.92 (23) | 70.45 (30) | ||
| S. cerevisiae | ŁOCK 0068 | 100 A | 77.68 ± 1.53 B (22) | 70.62 ± 1.17 C (29) | 64.57 ± 0.57 D (35) |
| ŁOCK 0113 | 88.32 ± 0.88 B (12) | 80.81 ± 1.45 C (19) | 78.03 ± 0.82 D (22) | ||
| ŁOCK 0119 | 80.87 ± 0.85 B (19) | 65.57 ± 1.52 C (34) | 57.50 ± 0.83 D (43) | ||
| ŁOCK 0137 | 84.16 ± 1.40 B (16) | 80.41 ± 2.27 B (20) | 76.10 ± 1.32 C (24) | ||
| ŁOCK 0140 | 80.64 ± 1.71 B (19) | 71.97 ± 2.04 C (20) | 63.07 ± 1.49 D (37) | ||
| ŁOCK 0142 | 80.28 ± 2.07 B (20) | 69.80 ± 1.61 C (30) | 60.91 ± 1.24 D (39) | ||
| Average concentration (μg/ml) (decrease (%)) | 81.99 (18) | 73.20 (27) | 66.70 (33) | ||
*Values labelled by different capital letters were significantly different per analysed strain (p < 0.05)