Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 2;2020:3049098. doi: 10.1155/2020/3049098

Table 5.

Comparison between different models of ROC analysis.

Models p values
Linolelaidic Acid (C18:2N6T)_Combine 0.0065
L-Dihydroorotic Acid_Combine 0.00194
Azoxystrobin Acid_Combine 0.0076
L-Dihydroorotic Acid_Linolelaidic Acid (C18:2N6T) 0.8192
Azoxystrobin Acid_Linolelaidic Acid (C18:2N6T) 0.8194
Azoxystrobin Acid_L-Dihydroorotic Acid 0.6862
Linolelaidic Acid (C18:2N6T)_combine1 0.0886
L-Dihydroorotic Acid_combine1 0.13
Azoxystrobin Acid_combine1 0.0502

The model of Combine 1 contains Linolelaidic Acid (C18:2N6T), L-Dihydroorotic Acid, and Azoxystrobin Acid; the model of Combine contains 11 metabolites. Chi-square test was utilized to compare the differences.