Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Arap 2014.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed and LILACS; dates of search not reported

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by first and last author, and keywords

    • Matching criteria not reported

Data
  • Included 195 abstracts presented at the 2001 to 2007 American Urological Association meetings

  • Included all abstracts where at least 2/3 of author institutions were from Brazil

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Median time to publication

  • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published

Outcomes
  • 100 of 195 abstracts published

  • 7/14 abstracts presented at the 2001 meeting,16/31 at the 2002 meeting, 12/29 at the 2003 meeting, 23/41 at the 2004 meeting, 13/31 at the 2005 meeting, 9/17 at the 2006 meeting, and 15/32 at the 2007 meeting published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Median time to publication = 18.8 months

    • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 126 months showed proportion published = 54.1% (105/195 abstracts)

  • No factors other than meeting year related to proportion of abstracts published reported

Notes
  • Urology

  • Funding not reported

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all Brazilian abstracts.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 2 databases.
Follow‐up time? Unclear Dates of search not reported.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of meeting year for association with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2 tests.