Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Mean time to publication
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published
'Positive' versus not 'positive'
Sample size equal to or above the median versus sample size below the median
Oral versus poster presentation
RCT design versus non‐RCT design
North American versus European versus rest of the world origin
Subspecialty
|
Outcomes |
199 of 472 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
160/361 'positive' (defined as significant results) versus 23/56 not 'positive' abstract results published
73/197 abstracts with sample size equal to or above the median versus 106/230 abstracts with sample size below the median published
83/210 abstracts presented orally versus 116/262 abstracts presented as poster published
69/146 abstracts with RCT design versus 128/326 abstracts with non‐RCT design published
8/14 abstracts originating in North America versus 184/408 abstracts from Europe versus 7/49 abstracts from rest of the world published
|
Notes |
Anesthesiology
Funding not reported
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 2 databases. |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
The meeting had 5 years follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of positive results, sample size, type presentation, study design, country or origin and subspecialty with publication by stratified analysis and Wilcoxon signed rank sum or U‐tests. |