Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Chapman 2012.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Methodology Register to May 2009, then to September 2010 for 2007 meeting

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by all authors and keywords

    • Matched abstract to full‐length publication by

      • Title 

  • Handsearched and searched citations in review articles

Data
  • Included 908 abstracts presented at the 1997 to 2007 Cochrane Colloquia meetings

  • Included all abstracts that presented "research relevant to the methods of systematic reviews or other health care evaluations"

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Mean and median time to publication, overall and by meeting

  • Survival analysis of publication rate

  • Oral versus poster presentation

  • Methodologic/topic area

Outcomes
  • 312 of 908 abstracts published

  • 21/63 abstracts presented at the 1997 meeting, 21/58 at the 1998 meeting, 20/59 at the 1999 meeting, 10/32 at the 2000 meeting, 27/85 at the 2001 meeting, 12/89 at the 2002 meeting, 44/115 at the 2003 meeting, 45/113 at the 2004 meeting, 42/119 at the 2005 meeting, 37/133 at the 2006 meeting, and 33/92 at the 2007 meeting published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Mean time to publication = 22.8  months, overall

    • Mean time to publication = 37.2 months for 1997 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 26.4 months for 1998 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 28.8 months for 1999 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 33.6 months for 2000 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 26.4 months for 2001 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 31.2 months for 2002 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 24.0 months for 2003 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 18.0 months for 2004 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 16.8 months for 2005 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 14.4 months for 2006 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Mean time to publication = 19.2 months for 2007 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months, overall

    • Median time to publication = 36 months for 1997 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months for 1998 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months for 1999 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 36 months for 2000 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months for 2001 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 30 months for 2002 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months for 2003 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 24 months for 2004 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 12 months for 2005 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 12 months for 2006 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Median time to publication = 12 months for 2007 Cochrane Colloquium

    • Survival analysis of proportion published at 144 months = 36.4%

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 123/312 abstracts presented orally versus 189/596 abstracts presented as poster published

Notes
  • Medical decision making/health policy‐ systematic reviews, health technology

  • Funding from the National Institute for Health Research; National Health Research and Development Program, the Cochrane Collaboration

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts that described a specific topic, so low risk of bias.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 3 databases, and performed handsearches and citation searches.
Follow‐up time? Yes All meetings before 2006 had at least 48 months follow‐up. The meetings in 2006 and 2007 only had 36 months follow‐up.
Matching? No Matched by only 1 criterion.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of meeting year, type presentation, and methodologic area with publication using stratified analysis.