Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Median time to publication
Survival analysis of publication rate
'Positive' versus not 'positive'
Sample size equal to or above the median versus sample size below the median
|
Outcomes |
57 of 178 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
43/113 'positive' (defined as experimental better than control) versus 14/42 not 'positive' abstract results published
36/92 abstracts with sample size equal to or above the median versus 25/78 abstracts with sample size below the median published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all RCTs with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 3 databases. |
Follow‐up time? |
Unclear |
Follow‐up of abstracts as short as 3 months to multiple years. Unclear how many abstracts were followed up for < 48 months. |
Matching? |
Yes |
Matched by 4 different criteria. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of positive results and sample size with publication using stratified analysis and time to publication with univariate Cox regression models. |