Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
Included 226 abstracts presented at the 2007 Congrès de l’Association Français d’Urologie
Included all abstracts presented orally except 18 presentations (videos, invited speakers, sponsors)
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Median time to publication
Presenter an urologist in education versus urologist
|
Outcomes |
96 of 226 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
|
Notes |
Urology
Funding not reported
Thesis (memoire)
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts presented orally with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 1 database and publication lists of authors. |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
The meeting had 72 months follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of author status with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2 test. |