Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Median time to publication
RCT or systematic review design versus other designs
UK region
Prospective versus retrospective
Subspecialty
|
Outcomes |
606 of 909 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 1 database and contacted abstract authors. |
Follow‐up time? |
Unclear |
Date of search not reported. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
Yes |
Examined association of type presentation, study design, origin within UK, prospective status, award winning status, and subspecialty with publication using multivariable logistic regression analysis. |