Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Mean time to publication, overall and by country
Clinical versus basic science research
North American versus European versus rest of world origin
US versus rest of world origin
Subspecialty
|
Outcomes |
1229 of 2512 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
47.2% of abstracts describing clinical research versus 54.1% of abstracts describing clinical research published
563/1221 abstracts originating from North America versus 406/766 abstracts originating from Europe versus 89/179 abstracts originating from Japan versus 24/55 abstracts originating from Australia versus 78/129 abstracts with multinational origin published
519/1134 abstracts originating from the US versus 563/1087 abstracts originating from the rest of the world published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
The meeting had 5 years of follow‐up |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of country of origin, type science, and subspecialty with publication using stratified analysis and Fisher's exact test. |