Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
Included 27,208 abstracts presented at the 2006 to 2008 American Heart Association, American College of Cardiology, and European Society of Cardiology meetings
Included all abstracts except duplicate entries
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting
Median time to publication, overall and by meeting
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published by meeting
Clinical research versus basic science research versus population science
US origin versus German versus Japanese versus Italian versus UK origin versus rest of the world origin
|
Outcomes |
8,335 of 27,208 abstracts published
2931/10838 abstracts presented at the 2006 to 2008 European Society of Cardiology meetings, 1481/5005 at the 2006 to 2008 American College of Cardiology meetings, and 3923/11365 at the American Heart Association meetings published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
Median time to publication = 12 months (IQR = 7 to 19 months), overall
Median time to publication = 13 months (IQR = 7 to 19 months) for 2006 to 2008 American Heart Association meetings
Median time to publication = 13 months (IQR = 6 to 18 months) for 2006 to 2008 American College of Cardiology meetings
Median time to publication = 12 months (IQR = 6 to 18 months) for 2006 to 2008 European Society of Cardiology meetings
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 24 months showed proportion published = 32% (3637/11365 abstracts) for 2006 to 2008 American Heart Association meetings
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 24 months showed proportion published = 26% (1301/5005 abstracts) for 2006 to 2008 American College of Cardiology meetings
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 24 months showed proportion published = 24% (2601/10838 abstracts) for 2006 to 2008 European Society of Cardiology meetings
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
5,099/17,168 abstracts describing clinical research versus 2,140/6,203 abstracts describing basic science research versus 1,105/3,836 abstracts describing population science published
3,400/10,366 abstracts originating from USA versus 986/3,102 abstracts originating from Germany versus 848/2,884 abstracts originating from Japan versus 592/2,013 abstracts originating from Italy versus 581/1,850 abstracts originating from UK versus 1,928/6,993 abstracts with rest of the world origin published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database. |
Follow‐up time? |
No |
The majority of meetings only had 24 months follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
Yes |
Examined association of meeting by year, type science, country of origin, prospective status, abstract quality, and subspecialty with publication using multivariable logistic regression analysis. |