Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Harris 2006.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • Embase, MEDLINE to March 2004

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by all authors and keywords

    • Matching criteria not reported

  • Contacted abstract authors directly

Data
  • Included 200 abstracts presented at the 1998 Australian Orthopaedic Association meeting

  • Included all abstracts accepted as oral presentations

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published

  • 'Positive' versus not 'positive'

  • Clinical research versus basic science research

  • RCT design versus observational versus case series versus other design

  • North American versus European versus Australian versus Asian versus Oceanian origin

Outcomes
  • 62 of 200 abstracts published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time not reported

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 12/24 'positive' (defined as significant results) versus 50/176 not 'positive' abstract results published

    • 45/132 'positive' (defined as experimental better than control) versus 17/68 not 'positive' abstract results published

    • 40/159 abstracts describing clinical research versus 22/41 abstracts describing basic science research published

    • 1/3 abstracts with RCT design versus 17/41 abstracts with observational study design versus 31/103 abstracts with case series design versus 13/53 with other design published

    • 21/55 abstracts originating from North America versus 5/19 abstracts from Europe versus 32/110 abstracts from Australia versus 4/11 abstracts from Asia versus 0/5 abstracts from Oceania published

Notes
  • Orthopedics/orthopedic surgery

  • Funding not reported

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts accepted as oral presentations
Search for publications? Yes Searched 2 databases and contacted abstract authors.
Follow‐up time? Yes The meeting had 6 years follow‐up.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? Yes Examined association of positive results, type science, study design, and country of origin using multivariable logistic regression analysis.