Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Harshavardhana 2009.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed to May 2009

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Search criteria not reported

    • Matched abstract to full‐length publication by

      • All authors

      • Sample Size

      • Contents

      • Methodology

      • Results

      • Level of evidence

      • Conclusions

      • Conflict of interest

Data
  • Included 278 abstracts presented at the 2000 to 2004 Cervical Spine Research Society meetings

  • Included all abstracts presented orally

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published

Outcomes
  • 203 of 278 abstracts published

  • 43/59 abstracts presented at the 2000 meeting, 30/51 at the 2001 meeting, 43/58 at the 2002 meeting, 48/57 at the 2003 meeting, and 39/53 at the 2004 meeting published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 24 months showed proportion published = 55.4% (154/278 abstracts)

  • No factors other than meeting year related to proportion of abstracts published reported

Notes
  • Orthopedics/orthopedic surgery

  • Funding not reported

  • Data extracted from abstract

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts presented orally.
Search for publications? No Searched only 1 database.
Follow‐up time? Yes All meetings had at least 5 years follow‐up.
Matching? Yes Matched by 8 different criteria.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of meeting year with publication using stratified analysis