Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Mily 2008.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed from January 2001 to December 2005

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Search criteria not reported

    • Matching criteria not reported

Data
  • Included 128 abstracts presented at 2002 and 2003 European Society of Hypertension meetings

  • Included all abstracts

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published

  • 'Positive' versus not 'positive'

  • Sample size more than 500 versus between 50 and 500 versus less than 50

  • Oral versus poster presentation

  • International versus European Union country versus non‐European Union country versus non‐European country

  • 'Treatment concealed' versus no 'treatment concealed' published

  • RCT design versus non‐RCT design

Outcomes
  • 34 of 128 abstracts published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time not reported

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 25/93 'positive' (not defined) versus 9/35 not 'positive' abstract results published

    • 5/19 abstracts with sample size greater than 500 versus 16/47 abstracts with sample size between 50 and 500 versus 13/62 abstracts with sample size below 50 published

    • 6/15 abstracts presented orally versus 28/115 abstracts presented as poster published

    • 15/28 abstracts with an international origin versus 13/57 abstracts originating from a single European Union country versus 2/18 abstracts originating from a single non‐European Union country versus 4/25 abstracts originating from outside Europe published

    • 17/43 abstracts with 'treatment concealed' versus 14/71 abstracts without 'treatment concealed' published

    • 24/65 abstracts with RCT design versus 10/52 abstracts with non‐RCT design published

Notes
  • General medicine/primary care ‐ hypertension

  • Funding not reported

  • Data extracted from abstract

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts.
Search for publications? No Searched only 1 database.
Follow‐up time? No All meetings had less than 48 months follow‐up.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of positive results, sample size, type presentation, European origin, study design, and 'treatment concealment' with publication using stratified analysis and unspecified. statistical tests.