Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting
Mean time to publication
Clinical research versus basic science research
Retrospective versus prospective research
|
Outcomes |
66 of 203 abstracts published
13/49 abstracts presented at the 2002 meeting, 17/52 at the 2003 meeting, 20/50 at the 2004 meeting, and 16/52 at the 2005 meeting published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
49/167 abstracts describing clinical research versus 16/36 abstracts describing basic science research published
24/94 abstracts describing retrospective studies versus 24/71 abstracts describing prospective studies published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database. |
Follow‐up time? |
Unclear |
Date of search not reported. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of meeting year, type science, and prospective status using stratified analysis and unspecified statistical tests. |