Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Petticrew 1999.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • Electronic database not specified; dates of search not reported

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Search criteria not reported

    • Matching criteria not reported

  • Contacted abstract authors directly

Data
  • Included 77 abstracts presented at the 1996 Society of Social Medicine meeting

  • Included all abstracts accepted for oral presentation

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published

  • 'Positive' versus not 'positive'

Outcomes
  • 39 of 77 abstracts published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time not reported

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 18/36 'positive' (defined as experimental better than control) versus 21/41 not 'positive' abstract results published

Notes
  • Sociology

  • Reported receiving no funding

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts accepted for oral presentation.
Search for publications? Yes Searched database, but number and type of database not reported, and contacted abstract authors.
Follow‐up time? Unclear Date of search not reported.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of positive results with publication using stratified analysis and calculated relative risks.