Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and % by meeting
Mean time to publication
Oral versus oral poster versus poster presentation
University versus community setting
Author location
|
Outcomes |
483 of 867 abstracts published
95/165 presented at the 2004 meeting, 42/89 at the 2005 meeting, 56/99 at the 2006 meeting, 53/85 at the 2007 meeting, 51/81 at the 2008 meeting, 50/83 at the 2009 meeting, 35/76 at the 2010 meeting, 46/91 at the 2011 meeting, and 54/97 at the 2012 meeting published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
169/205 abstracts presented orally versus 190/459 abstracts presented as poster versus 124/203 abstracts presented as oral poster published
465/804 abstracts with academic affiliation versus 16/61 abstracts without an academic affiliation published
462/826 abstracts with US first author versus 20/40 with author from elsewhere published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database. |
Follow‐up time? |
Unclear |
Date of search not reported. |
Matching? |
Yes |
Matched by 2 different criteria. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of meeting year by type presentation, university affiliation, and author location with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2 or ANOVA tests. |