Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Propst 2015.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed; date of search not reported

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by all authors and title

    • Matched abstract to full‐length publication by

      • Objective

      • Data

Data
  • Included 867 abstracts presented at the 2004 to 2012 Society of Gynecologic Surgeons Annual Scientific meetings

  • Included all abstracts except tips and tricks and video presentations

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and % by meeting

  • Mean time to publication

  • Oral versus oral poster versus poster presentation

  • University versus community setting

  • Author location

Outcomes
  • 483 of 867 abstracts published

  • 95/165 presented at the 2004 meeting, 42/89 at the 2005 meeting, 56/99 at the 2006 meeting, 53/85 at the 2007 meeting, 51/81 at the 2008 meeting, 50/83 at the 2009 meeting, 35/76 at the 2010 meeting, 46/91 at the 2011 meeting, and 54/97 at the 2012 meeting published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Mean time to publication = 12.7 months (SD=11.7; range = ‐5 to 82 months)

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 169/205 abstracts presented orally versus 190/459 abstracts presented as poster versus 124/203 abstracts presented as oral poster published

    • 465/804 abstracts with academic affiliation versus 16/61 abstracts without an academic affiliation published

    • 462/826 abstracts with US first author versus 20/40 with author from elsewhere published

Notes
  • Gynecology/obstetrics ‐ gynecologic surgery

  • Funding not reported

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions.
Search for publications? No Searched only 1 database.
Follow‐up time? Unclear Date of search not reported.
Matching? Yes Matched by 2 different criteria.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of meeting year by type presentation, university affiliation, and author location with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2 or ANOVA tests.