Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting
Mean time to publication, overall and by meeting
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published
Subspecialty (secondary publication by Fuller 2011)
|
Outcomes |
352 of 770 abstracts published
41/96 abstracts presented at the 1998 meeting, 36/89 at the 1999 meeting, 52/104 at the 2000 meeting, 35/75 at the 2001 meeting, 42/84 at the 2002 meeting, 43/83 at the 2003 meeting, 38/86 at the 2004 meeting, 33/76 at the 2005 meeting, and 32/78 at the 2006 meeting published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
Mean time to publication = 32.4 months, overall
Mean time to publication = 43.0 months for the 1998 meeting
Mean time to publication = 33.0 months for the 1999 meeting
Mean time to publication = 33.6 months for the 2000 meeting
Mean time to publication = 30.6 months for the 2001 meeting
Mean time to publication = 39.6 months for the 2002 meeting
Mean time to publication = 29.4 months for the 2003 meeting
Mean time to publication = 27.0 months for the 2004 meeting
Mean time to publication = 28.5 months for the 2005 meeting
Mean time to publication = 19.2 months for the 2006 meeting
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 120 months showed proportion published = 47.5% (366/770 abstracts)
No factors other than subspecialty related to proportion of abstracts published reported
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 2 databases. |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
All meetings had at least 48 months follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of meeting year and subspecialty with publication using stratified analysis. |