Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Schoenfeld 2012.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • PubMed and Google/Google Scholar in spring of 2010

    • Search completed by investigator

    • Searched by all authors, keywords, and lead author

    • Matching criteria not reported

Data
  • Included 770 abstracts presented at the 1998 to 2006 Society of Military Orthopaedic Surgeons meetings

  • Included all abstracts

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Mean time to publication, overall and by meeting

  • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published

  • Subspecialty (secondary publication by Fuller 2011)

Outcomes
  • 352 of 770 abstracts published

  • 41/96 abstracts presented at the 1998 meeting, 36/89 at the 1999 meeting, 52/104 at the 2000 meeting, 35/75 at the 2001 meeting, 42/84 at the 2002 meeting, 43/83 at the 2003 meeting, 38/86 at the 2004 meeting, 33/76 at the 2005 meeting, and 32/78 at the 2006 meeting published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Mean time to publication = 32.4 months, overall

    • Mean time to publication = 43.0 months for the 1998 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 33.0 months for the 1999 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 33.6 months for the 2000 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 30.6 months for the 2001 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 39.6 months for the 2002 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 29.4 months for the 2003 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 27.0 months for the 2004 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 28.5 months for the 2005 meeting

    • Mean time to publication = 19.2 months for the 2006 meeting

    • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 120 months showed proportion published = 47.5% (366/770 abstracts)

  • No factors other than subspecialty related to proportion of abstracts published reported

Notes
  • Orthopedics/orthopedic surgery

  • Funding not reported

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 2 databases.
Follow‐up time? Yes All meetings had at least 48 months follow‐up.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? No Examined association of meeting year and subspecialty with publication using stratified analysis.