Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
Included 276 abstracts presented at the 2000 and 2001 European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology meetings
Included all abstracts accepted for oral presentation except for 2 withdrawn abstracts and 6 published before the meeting
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting
Median time to publication
Clinical research versus other research
North American versus European versus rest of the world origin
'Prospective' versus 'retrospective' versus other design
Interventional versus diagnostic
Subspecialty
Conference year
|
Outcomes |
109 of 276 abstracts published
46/111 abstracts presented at the 2000 meeting, and 63/165 at the 2001 meeting published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
109/264 abstracts describing clinical research versus 0/12 abstracts describing other research published
10/16 abstracts originating from North America versus 83/212 abstracts from Europe versus 16/48 abstracts from rest of the world published
70/153 abstracts with 'prospective' study design versus 39/111 abstracts with 'retrospective' study design versus 0/12 abstracts with other study design published
28/64 abstracts describing therapy versus 81/212 abstracts describing diagnostic tests published
|
Notes |
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts accepted for oral presentation with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database. |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
The 2000 meeting had 48 months follow‐up, the 2001 meeting only had 36 months follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of type science, country of origin, prospective status, and type clinical study with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2 test or logistic regression analysis for country of origin. |