Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Toro‐Polo 2012.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • MEDLINE, SciELO, LILACS, RedALyC, Portal Revist@s Peruanas, and Sistema de Bibliotecas de la Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos from June to July 2011

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by all authors, location of study, population, and main result

    • Matched abstract to full‐length publication by

      • One author

      • Results

      • Time

      • Population

      • Location

Data
  • Included 532 abstracts submitted to the 2002 to 2005 and 2006 to 2009 Sociedad Científica Médico Estudiantil Peruana meetings

  • Included all abstracts except abstracts from students with foreign affiliation (162) and those that were presented more than once

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Mean and median time to publication

  • Collaborative authorship versus other

  • Analytical versus descriptive work

Outcomes
  • 52 of 532 abstracts published

  • 21/254 abstracts presented at the 2002 to 2005 meetings and 31/278 at the 2006 to 2009 meetings published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Mean time to publication = 22.6 months (SD = 24.0)

    • Median time to publication = 13 months (range = 0 to 75 months)

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 3/6 abstracts with collaborative authorship versus 49/526 abstracts without collaborative authorship published

    • 34/272 abstracts presenting analytical work versus 18/260 abstracts presenting descriptive work published

Notes
  • General medicine/primary care

  • Reported having received no funding

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 6 databases.
Follow‐up time? Yes All meetings had at least 72 months follow‐up.
Matching? Yes Matched by 5 different criteria.
Adjustment for confounding? Yes Examined association of meeting year, collaborative authorship and type science with publication using unspecified multivariable analyses.