Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
Included 449 abstracts presented at the 2005 to 2006 Research in Medical Education Conference and Canadian Conference on Medical Education meetings
Included all abstracts excluding 7 (4 withdrawn, 1 missing, 2 published before abstract deadline)
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting
Median time to publication
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published
Oral versus poster presentation
Multi‐centered versus single center
Mixed methods versus qualitative methods versus quantitative methods
Multi‐center authorship versus not
Research scholarship versus evaluation of program or innovation scholarship versus other scholarly activities
Completed works versus work in progress
|
Outcomes |
156 of 449 abstracts published
86/232 abstracts presented at the Research in Medical Education Conference meetings, and 70/217 at the Canadian Conference on Medical Education meetings published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
Median time to publication = 20 months (IQR = 10 to 30 months, range = ‐9 to 76 months)
Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 60 months showed proportion published = 33.6% (151/449 abstracts)
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
80/165 abstracts presented orally versus 76/284 abstracts presented as poster published
33/81 abstracts with multiple centers versus 110/301 abstracts with a single center published
20/36 methods with mixed methods design versus 32/69 abstracts with qualitative design versus 91/254 abstracts with quantitative design published
60/118 abstracts with multi‐center authorship versus 96/331 abstracts without multi‐center authorship published
110/283 abstracts on research versus 33/99 abstracts on evaluation of program or innovation versus 16/67 abstracts on other scholarly activity published
125/300 abstracts of completed works versus 18/82 abstracts with works in progress published
|
Notes |
Medical education/library science
Government funding and funding through the Hospital of Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics fellowship grant
Data abstracted from letter
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions. |
Search for publications? |
Yes |
Searched 4 databases. |
Follow‐up time? |
Yes |
All meetings had at least 6 years follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
Yes |
Examined association of meeting, type of presentation, multi‐center status, study design, number of authors, type of science, completion status, and presence of author with doctorate degree with publication using multivariable logistic regression analyses. |