Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Walsh 2013.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • Embase, MEDLINE, Google/Google Scholar, and Eric to November 2012

    • Person completing the search not reported

    • Searched by first, second, and last author, keywords, and title

    • Matching criteria not reported

Data
  • Included 449 abstracts presented at the 2005 to 2006 Research in Medical Education Conference and Canadian Conference on Medical Education meetings

  • Included all abstracts excluding 7 (4 withdrawn, 1 missing, 2 published before abstract deadline)

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published, overall and by meeting

  • Median time to publication

  • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published

  • Oral versus poster presentation

  • Multi‐centered versus single center

  • Mixed methods versus qualitative methods versus quantitative methods

  • Multi‐center authorship versus not

  • Research scholarship versus evaluation of program or innovation scholarship versus other scholarly activities

  • Completed works versus work in progress

Outcomes
  • 156 of 449 abstracts published

  • 86/232 abstracts presented at the Research in Medical Education Conference meetings, and 70/217 at the Canadian Conference on Medical Education meetings published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Median time to publication = 20 months (IQR = 10 to 30 months, range = ‐9 to 76 months)

    • Cumulative proportion of abstracts published at 60 months showed proportion published = 33.6% (151/449 abstracts)

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 80/165 abstracts presented orally versus 76/284 abstracts presented as poster published

    • 33/81 abstracts with multiple centers versus 110/301 abstracts with a single center published

    • 20/36 methods with mixed methods design versus 32/69 abstracts with qualitative design versus 91/254 abstracts with quantitative design published

    • 60/118 abstracts with multi‐center authorship versus 96/331 abstracts without multi‐center authorship published

    • 110/283 abstracts on research versus 33/99 abstracts on evaluation of program or innovation versus 16/67 abstracts on other scholarly activity published

    • 125/300 abstracts of completed works versus 18/82 abstracts with works in progress published

Notes
  • Medical education/library science

  • Government funding and funding through the Hospital of Sick Children, Department of Paediatrics fellowship grant

  • Data abstracted from letter

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts with reasonable exceptions.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 4 databases.
Follow‐up time? Yes All meetings had at least 6 years follow‐up.
Matching? Unclear Matching criteria not reported.
Adjustment for confounding? Yes Examined association of meeting, type of presentation, multi‐center status, study design, number of authors, type of science, completion status, and presence of author with doctorate degree with publication using multivariable logistic regression analyses.