Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 20;2018(11):MR000005. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000005.pub4

Wong 2009.

Methods Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
  • Searched electronic database

    • MEDLINE, Embase for 5 years

    • Search completed by investigator

    • Searched by all authors and keywords

    • Matched abstract to full‐length publication by

      • Contents

      • Title

      • Similarities in authors' names

Data
  • Included 790 abstracts presented at the 2003 Annual Scientific Sessions of Heart Rhythm Society meeting

  • Included all abstracts

Comparisons
  • Proportion of abstracts published

  • Median time to publication

  • Survival analysis of publication rate

  • 'Positive' versus not 'positive'

  • Clinical research versus basic science research versus animal research versus simulation studies

  • RCT design versus non‐RCT design

Outcomes
  • 377 of 790 abstracts published

  • Proportion of abstracts published by time

    • Median time to publication = 16.7 months (IQR = 10.6 to 27.6 months)

    • Survival analysis of proportion published at 72 months = 47.7%

  • Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included

    • 185/370 'positive' (defined as significant results) versus 192/420 not 'positive' abstract results published

    • 256/586 abstracts describing clinical research versus 28/43 abstracts describing basic science research versus 78/133 abstracts describing animal research versus 15/28 abstracts describing simulation studies published

    • 37/62 abstracts with RCT design versus 340/728 abstracts with non‐RCT design published

Notes
  • Cardiology ‐electrophysiology

  • Funding by the National Heart Foundation of Australia, National Heart Foundation of New Zealand, the Kidney Health Foundation of Australia, the University of Adelaide, the Royal Adelaide Hospital, the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia

Risk of bias
Item Authors' judgement Description
Sampling method? Yes Included all abstracts.
Search for publications? Yes Searched 2 databases.
Follow‐up time? Yes The meeting had 5 years follow‐up.
Matching? Yes Matched by 3 different criteria.
Adjustment for confounding? Yes Examined association of positive results, type science, and study design with publication using multivariable logistic regression.