Methods |
Identification of subsequent full‐length publications
|
Data |
|
Comparisons |
Proportion of abstracts published
Median time to publication
Oral versus poster presentation
Clinical research versus preclinical research
RCT design versus non‐RCT design
Multi‐centered versus single center
Sample size
Type disease
|
Outcomes |
601 of 1732 abstracts published
-
Proportion of abstracts published by time
-
Factors related to proportion of abstracts published included
119/270 abstracts presented orally versus 482/1462 abstracts presented as poster published
393/1168 abstracts describing clinical research versus 208/564 abstracts describing preclinical research published
65/144 abstracts describing RCTs versus 328/1024 abstracts describing other research designs published
265/590 abstracts with multiple centers versus 336/1042 abstracts with a single center published
Sample size (higher than median vs. lower than median: 36.2% vs. 30.3%, P = 0.017)
|
Notes |
Rheumatology
Funding not reported
|
Risk of bias |
Item |
Authors' judgement |
Description |
Sampling method? |
Yes |
Included all abstracts. |
Search for publications? |
No |
Searched only 1 database. |
Follow‐up time? |
No |
The meeting only had 36 months follow‐up. |
Matching? |
Unclear |
Matching criteria not reported. |
Adjustment for confounding? |
No |
Examined association of type of presentation, study design, multi‐center status, sample size, and type disease with publication using stratified analysis and Chi2, Mann‐Whitney U, and ANOVA tests. |