Skip to main content
. 2019 Aug 7;11(2):280–292. doi: 10.1093/advances/nmz076

TABLE 2.

Subgroup analysis on the effects of whole-grain consumption on BMI

Effect sizes, n Mean (95% CI) P: within1 I 2,2 % P: between
Overall 10 0.61 (0.54, 0.95) <0.001 90.0
Sex <0.001
 Both 8 −0.11 (−0.34 to 0.13) 0.38 0
 Females 2 1.63 (1.35–1.92) <0.001 61.4
Baseline mean of BMI 0.002
 Nonobese (<30 kg/m2) 2 0.01 (−0.42 to 0.43) 0.98 0
 Obese (≥30 kg/m2) 8 0.74 (0.54–0.95) <0.001 91.3
Health condition <0.001
 Healthy 1 −0.20 (−0.96 to 0.56) 0.60 0
 Unhealthy 9 0.66 (0.47–0.85) <0.001 90.6
Duration of intervention 0.002
 <8 wk 3 −0.00 (−0.43 to 0.42) 0.98 0
 ≥8 wk 7 0.75 (0.55–0.95) <0.001 92.4
Study design <0.001
 Parallel 6 1.10 (0.86–1.35) <0.001 90.6
 Crossover 4 −0.02 (−0.30 to 0.25) 0.87 0
Calorie restriction 0.02
 Hypocaloric diet 2 −0.55 (−1.55 to 0.46) 0.28 0
 Isocaloric diet 8 0.65 (0.46–0.84) <0.001 91.7
Intervention type <0.001
 Whole-grain diet 4 −0.11 (−0.43 to 0.20) 0.47 0
 Whole-grain products 6 0.98 (0.76–1.21) <0.001 91.3
Anthropometric measures as: <0.001
 Primary outcome variables 5 1.00 (0.77–1.23) <0.001 92.9
 Secondary outcome variables 5 −0.10 (−0.40 to 0.21) 0.53 0
1

Refers to the mean (95% CI).

2

Inconsistency, percentage of variation across studies due to heterogeneity.