South Africa 1997b.
Methods | Sealed, numbered, opaque envelopes. Nursing sister not involved in clinical care then made up the allocated solution (4 mL). 8 women excluded (9%) as delivered without receiving antihypertensive therapy. CFU ‐ B, blinding ‐ B. | |
Participants | 88 women at least 28 weeks' gestation, DBP > 110 mmHg or DBP > 100 mmHg for 30 mins. | |
Interventions | Ketanserin: 500 mL crystalloid IV over 15 min, then bolus 10 mg ketanserin in 4 mL IV. Bolus repeated every 20 min, until DBP 90 mmHg, to a maximum of 4 doses. Hydralazine: 500 mL crystalloid IV over 15 min, then bolus 5 mg hydralazine in 4 mL IV. Bolus repeated every 20 min, until DBP 90 mmHg, to a maximum of 4 doses. | |
Outcomes | Woman: death, persistent high BP (DBP > 90 mmHg after 4 bolus injections), delivery for fetal distress, caesarean section. Baby: death. | |
Notes | Trial stopped by 'monitoring committee', reason not stated. | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Low risk | “Patients were then assigned to receive either 5 mg dihydralazine or 10 mg of ketanserin according to random numbers which had been previously generated by computer.” |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Low risk | “Successively numbered sealed, opaque envelopes contained the instructions for the preparation of each new patient’s medication. A nursing sister not involved in the management of the particular prepared patient.” |
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Participant/clinician appeared to be blinded, “In either case, the managing physician was given a syringe with four millilitre of clear fluid.” |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | Not reported. |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | The study was stopped early on the advice of the monitoring committee “the study stopped after the analysis of 88 consecutive patients who qualified for the study.” 8 of these were not included in the analysis – 6 patients who qualified for the study were not randomised because their BP was lower than 90 mm Hg after the fluid overload and 2 patients did not receive the medication after randomisation – in both the fetal heart rate pattern deteriorated to such a degree that emergency caesarean sections were performed. |
Selective reporting (reporting bias) | Low risk | All expected outcomes reported. |
Other bias | Unclear risk | “The groups were comparable regarding maternal age, gravidity and gestation age” However, study stopped early ‐ reasons not described and no baseline characteristics for 8 patients who were not included in the analysis. |