Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 31;11(2):154. doi: 10.3390/genes11020154

Table 2.

Genetic diversity indices for microsatellite genotypes for 10 populations of Petrogale xanthopus xanthopus, including: the average number of samples analyzed in each population (# samples), allelic diversity, unique alleles, % rare alleles, allelic richness, i.e., the allelic diversity accounting for variation in sample size across populations (in this case accounting for N = 8), observed heterozygosity (HO), expected heterozygosity (HE), and inbreeding coefficient (FIS). Note: the FIS values are all not significant.

Population # Samples Allelic Diversity Unique Alleles % Rare Alleles Allelic Richness HO HE FIS
1. Aroona Dam 25 2.76 ± 0.25 0.18 ± 0.10 0.6 2.58 ± 0.82 0.52 ± 0.05 0.46 ± 0.05 −0.095
2. Eregunda 65 5.18 ± 0.38 0.35 ± 0.15 15.9 3.86 ± 1.01 0.65 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.03 −0.030
3. Homestead Range 8 3.94 ± 0.29 0.18 ± 0.13 0.0 3.94 ± 1.20 0.73 ± 0.05 0.62 ± 0.03 −0.115
4. Mt Stuart 3 2.53 ± 0.24 0.06 ± 0.06 0.0 - 0.65 ± 0.09 0.46 ± 0.06 −0.234
5. Sandy Creek 17 4.59 ± 0.32 0.12 ± 0.08 11.4 3.74 ± 0.93 0.62 ± 0.05 0.56 ± 0.03 −0.070
6. Wilkawillina North 26 5.12 ± 0.47 0.06 ± 0.06 14.0 4.02 ± 1.24 0.69 ± 0.03 0.63 ± 0.03 −0.074
7. Wilkawillina South 75 6.12 ± 0.49 0.18 ± 0.13 19.7 4.34 ± 1.25 0.69 ± 0.03 0.66 ± 0.03 −0.027
8. Mt Friday 21 3.06 ± 0.26 0.41 ± 0.15 3.8 2.77 ± 0.90 0.52 ± 0.06 0.46 ± 0.05 −0.102
9. Yandinga 91 2.71 ± 0.21 0.18 ± 0.13 5.7 2.23 ± 0.56 0.38 ± 0.05 0.37 ± 0.05 −0.038
10. Olary Hills 11 3.41 ± 0.21 0.35 ± 0.15 5.1 3.26 ± 0.82 0.65 ± 0.05 0.56 ± 0.03 −0.110