Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 27;9(2):347. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020347

Table 3.

Patient- and therapist-rated working alliance in the two treatment groups.

Patients Therapists
Mean difference Mean difference
(95% CI) (95% CI)
Outcome 1 bCBT CBT Total bCBT vs. CBT bCBT CBT Total bCBT vs. CBT
n = 39 n = 34 n = 73 n = 46 n = 44 n = 90
Goal 16.3 (3.1) 16.1 (3.2) 16.2 (3.1) 0.25 (−1.22; 1.71) 12.4 (1.9) 11.7 (1.8) 12.1 (1.9) 0.73 (0.04; 1.50) a
Scaled 4.1 (0.8) 4.0 (0.8) 4.1 (0.8) 4.1 (0.6) 3.9 (0.6) 4.0 (0.6)
Task 12.4 (4.1) 11.9 (4.2) 12.2 (4.1) 0.47 (−1.45; 2.40) 12.1 (2.0) 11.2 (1.6) 11.7 (1.9) 0.93 (0.17; 1.68) b
Scaled 3.1 (1.0) 3.0 (1.1) 3.0 (1.0) 4.0 (0.7) 3.7 (0.5) 3.9 (0.6)
Bond 15.6 (3.3) 14.7 (3.6) 15.2 (3.4) 0.97 (−0.64; 2.57) 17.9 (1.9) 17.6 (2.1) 17.7 (2.0) 0.28 (−0.52; 1.17)
Scaled 3.9 (0.8) 3.7 (0.9) 3.8 (0.9) 4.6 (0.5) 4.4 (0.5) 4.4 (0.5)
Composite 3.7 (0.7) 3.6 (0.8) 3.6 (0.8) 0.14 (−0.22; 0.50) 4.2 (0.5) 4.0 (0.4) 4.1 (0.5) 0.20 (0.00; 0.40) c

Notes: 1 Data are presented as mean (standard deviation). bCBT: blended cognitive behavioral therapy; CBT: cognitive behavioral treatment (face-to-face only). a uncorrected: p = 0.063, Holm-corrected: p = 0.144; b uncorrected: p = 0.016, Holm-corrected: p = 0.063; c uncorrected: p = 0.048, Holm-corrected: p = 0.424.