Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 21;9(2):299. doi: 10.3390/jcm9020299

Table 3.

Subgroup analyses for validation of performance of RMI, CA125, GOT-1 (RMI + HE4), and GOT-2 (CA125 + HE4) comparing benign disease with EOC in early-and late stage tumors.

Group (n) Model FIGO I + II FIGO III + IV
ROC SN% (75% SP) SP% (Target SN) ROC SN% (75% SP) SP% (Target SN)
AUC 95% CI AUC 95% CI
Benign (445) vs. EOC FIGO
I + II (52)/FIGO III + IV (83)
RMI (cut-off < 200) 0.90 0.85–0.94 94 84 0.98 0.97-0.99 99 84
GOT-1 (RMI + HE4) 0.90 0.86–0.95 92 86 0.98 0.97-1.00 99 90
Benign (445) vs. EOC FIGO
I + II (52)/FIGO III + IV (83)
CA125 (cut-off > 35 U/mL) 0.84 0.79–0.90 75 68 0.96 0.94-0.98 96 68
GOT-2 (CA125 + HE4) 0.88 0.82–0.93 85 74 0.98 0.96-1.00 99 81

Specificity was calculated using target SN. Target SN = target sensitivity of RMI at cut-off >200 was 83% (early stage) and 98% (late stage); target sensitivity of CA125 at cut-off >35 was 85% (early stage) and 98% (late stage). AUC = area under the curve; EOC = epithelial ovarian cancer; FIGO = International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; FIGO I+II = Early stage tumors; FIGO III+IV = EOC late stage tumors; GOT-1 = Gothenburg index 1; GOT-2 = Gothenburg index 2; Pre-M = premenopausal; Post-M = postmenopausal; RMI = risk of malignancy index; ROC = receiver operating characteristics; SN = sensitivity; SP = specificity.