Skip to main content
. 2020 May;199:104595. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104595

Table 2.

Effect of different CSA-based scenarios on MBC (μg g−1 dry soil) during wheat crop growth stages (2 yrs’ mean).

Scenariosa Sowing Crown Root Initiation Tillering Panicle initiation Harvest
Surface soil (0−15 cm depth)
1 29.9Cb 65.8C 44.8C 73.3C 133.3D
2 56.6A 77.1AB 60.6B 115.3B 171.7C
3 52.1A 74.2B 67.9A 123.2A 187.6B
4 42.9B 81.7A 66.4A 126.8A 210.0A
Sub-surface soil (15−30 cm depth)
1 19.2B 44.2C 29.1B 58.6C 82.6C
2 37.7A 55.8B 34.8B 99.5B 143.6B
3 37.5A 50.0BC 34.6B 117.9A 171.2A
4 39.7A 68.9A 51.1A 113.5A 188.8A
Main effects P- value
Scenario (S) <0.05
Depth (D) <0.05
Growth stage (GS) <0.05
Year (Y) NS
Interaction effects
GS × S <0.05
S × Y <0.05
GS × Y <0.05

Where; CSA- climate smart agriculture, MBC- Microbial biomass carbon, Sc1: conventional rice-wheat system, Sc2: partial CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc3: full CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc4: full CSA based maize-wheat-mungbean system.

a

Refer Table 1 for scenario description.

b

Means followed by a similar uppercase letters within each column are not statistically different (P ≤ 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).