Skip to main content
. 2020 May;199:104595. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104595

Table 3.

Effect of different CSA-based scenarios on MBN (μg g−1 dry soil) during wheat crop growth stages (2 yrs’ mean).

Scenariosa Sowing Crown Root Initiation Tillering Panicle initiation Harvest
Surface soil (0−15 cm depth)
1 4.3Bb 6.0C 4.7C 9.2C 11.1C
2 5.7A 12.9A 7.2B 12.8B 19.1B
3 6.1A 8.7B 7.6B 14.5AB 17.1B
4 4.5B 9.1B 11.1A 15.9A 23.3A
Sub-surface soil (15−30 cm depth)
1 2.3B 4.9B 3.6B 6.9C 8.3C
2 4.2AB 5.6B 3.9B 10.5B 16.9A
3 3.8AB 5.3B 3.1B 12.2A 12.2B
4 5.7A 6.9A 5.7A 8.7C 13.5B
Main effects P- value
Scenario (S) NS
Depth (D) <0.05
Growth stage (GS) <0.05
Year (Y) NS
Interaction effects
GS × S <0.05
S × Y <0.05
GS × Y <0.05

Where; CSA- climate smart agriculture, MBC- Microbial biomass nitrogen, Sc1: conventional rice-wheat system, Sc2: partial CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc3: full CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc4: full CSA based maize-wheat-mungbean system.

a

Refer Table 1 for scenario description.

b

Means followed by a similar uppercase letters within each column are not statistically different (P ≤ 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).