Skip to main content
. 2020 May;199:104595. doi: 10.1016/j.still.2020.104595

Table 6.

Effect of different CSA-based scenarios on β-Glucosidase (μg p-NP per g soil per hr) during wheat crop growth stages (2 yrs’ mean).

Scenariosa Sowing Crown Root Initiation Tillering Panicle initiation Harvest
Surface soil (0−15 cm depth)
1 5.70Bb 5.38B 8.84C 44.40C 34.50B
2 10.63A 9.22A 15.80A 49.65C 36.30B
3 9.62A 8.26A 9.48C 61.08B 36.04B
4 9.59A 9.73A 12.09B 79.05A 44.59A
Sub-surface soil (15−30 cm depth)
1 3.77C 4.48C 5.05B 33.32B 26.26B
2 6.01A 5.35B 5.68B 43.24B 35.09A
3 4.65B 4.98BC 5.89B 61.98A 33.46A
4 4.58B 6.70A 7.28A 63.03A 31.93A
Main effects P- value
Scenario (S) <0.05
Depth (D) <0.05
Growth stage (GS) <0.05
Year (Y) NS
Interaction effects
GS × S <0.05
S × Y NS
GS × Y <0.05

Where; CSA- climate smart agriculture, Sc1: conventional rice-wheat system, Sc2: partial CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc3: full CSA based rice-wheat-mungbean system, Sc4: full CSA based maize-wheat-mungbean system.

a

Refer Table 1 for scenario description.

b

Means followed by a similar uppercase letters within each column are not statistically different (P ≤ 0.05, Duncan’s multiple range test).