5. Clinical relevance.
Study ID | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
Altmaier 1992 | + | ‐ | + | ‐ | + |
Bendix 1996 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Bendix 1997 | + | + | + | + | + |
Bendix 2000 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Bethge 2011 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Corey 1996 | + | + | ‐ | ‐ | + |
Faas 1995 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Gatchel 2003 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Heymans 2006 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Jensen 2001 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Jensen 2011 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Karjalainen 2003 | + | + | + | + | + |
Kool 2005 | + | + | + | + | + |
Lambeek 2010 | + | + | + | + | + |
Lindstrom 1992 | + | + | + | + | + |
Loisel 1997 | + | + | + | + | + |
Meyer 2005 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Mitchell 1994 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Staal 2004 | + | + | + | + | + |
Steenstra 2006 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Storheim 2003 | + | + | ‐ | ‐ | + |
Skouen 2002 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Roche 2007 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
van den Hout 2003 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |
Wright 2005 | + | + | + | ‐ | + |