Skip to main content
. 2013 Aug 30;2013(8):CD001822. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001822.pub3

Gatchel 2003.

Methods RCT
Participants 124 workers from orthopaedic practices with acute low‐back pain and decreased ability to perform normal job requirements because of pain for about 3.8 weeks. Mean age was 38.2 and 65% was male.
Interventions Intervention: a functional restoration early intervention of 3 weeks which consisted of four major components‐pscyhology, physical therapy, occupational therapy and case‐management. Contents were 3 physical evaluations, 1 physician evaluation, 18 physical therapy sessions (individual and group) 9 biofeedback/pain management sessions, 9 group didactic sessions, 9 case manager/occupational therapy sessions and 3 interdisciplinary team conferences. The number of sessions administered to patients was tailored to their specific needs, with most patients not needing all of the aforementioned number of sessions.
Control: non‐intervention, care as usual
Outcomes measured at 1 year after first evaluation: % return‐to‐work
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk urn randomization procedure
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk not stated
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ outcome assessors? Low risk 'by raters blind to study hypotheses'
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ patients? High risk patients aware of allocation and intervention content
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ care provider? High risk care providers aware of allocation and intervention content
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ drop‐outs? Low risk no dropouts
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes ‐ ITT analysis? Low risk ITT analysis
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk no suggestion found
Similarity of baseline characteristics? Low risk 'these three groups matched for age, gender, race, and time since original injury based upon and urn randomization procedure'
Co‐interventions avoided or similar? High risk control group received various types of treatment initiated by themselves
Compliance acceptable? Unclear risk not stated
Timing of the outcome assessment similar? Low risk all subjects followed up at 3, 6, 9, 12 months