Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 27;10(2):217. doi: 10.3390/nano10020217

Table 6.

The photocurable resin/nanofillers thermal conductivity comparison study with different nanocomposites.

Nanocomposites Thermal Conductivity (W·m−1·K−1) References
SLR/Ag-TNP-1.0 0.34 This work
® SLR/ANT800 0.29 [74]
@ MPTS/hBN-5% 0.30 [75]
# SU-8/FGS-2% 0.36 [76]
$ CE/BNNT-1.5% 0.40 [77]
& UV curable polyacrylate/PGN15 0.29 [78]
* UV curable polyacrylate/PGN25 0.27 [78]

® Stereolithography resin incorporated with 800 °C annealed anataseTiO2 nanoparticles. @ Photocurable acrylic-based photopolymer composites with 5 wt% of hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) modified with γ-Methacryloxypropyltrimethoxysilane. # Photocurable SU-8 epoxy-based composites containing 2 wt% functionalized graphene sheets (FGS). $ Photo curable epoxy-based composites which contain (3,4-Epoxy cyclohexylmethyl-3,4-epoxycyclohexane carboxylate (CE) with 1.5 wt% of Boron Nitride nanotubes (BNNTs). & UV-curable polyacrylate incorporated with 15 nm size gold nanocomposites (PGN15). * UV-curable polyacrylate incorporated with 25 nm size gold nanocomposites (PGN25).