Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 22;8(2):304. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020304

Table 3.

Compositional change values of the fecal microbiota at the genus level.

Genus Compositional Change (%) p Value q Value
CP1563-10-HOA Placebo
Blautia −2.1 ± 1.2 −0.8 ± 1.0 0.39 0.45
Bifidobacterium −0.0 ± 1.2 1.3 ± 1.3 0.44 0.45
Faecalibacterium 0.8 ± 1.1 2.0 ± 1.1 0.45 0.45
Coprococcus −1.1 ± 0.6 −1.3 ± 0.7 0.80 0.57
Lachnospiraceae;g_[Ruminococcus] −0.7 ± 0.5 −1.3 ± 0.6 0.43 0.45
Lachnospiraceae;g 1.0 ± 0.4 −0.6 ± 0.5 0.01 0.047
Roseburia 0.8 ± 0.7 −1.4 ± 0.6 0.01 0.047
Bacteroides 1.5 ± 1.3 2.3 ± 1.0 0.64 0.53
Streptococcus −0.8 ± 0.5 0.2 ± 0.6 0.21 0.37
Ruminococcus 0.4 ± 0.4 −0.3 ± 0.3 0.22 0.37
Dorea −0.1 ± 0.2 −0.2 ± 0.2 0.88 0.59
Erysipelotrichaceae;g_[Eubacterium] −0.0 ± 0.2 −0.1 ± 0.2 0.80 0.57
Lachnospiraceae;Other 0.1 ± 0.1 0.0 ± 0.1 0.62 0.53
Butyricicoccus 0.0 ± 1.1 −0.4 ± 0.1 0.046 0.12
Collinsella −0.3 ± 0.1 0.2 ± 0.1 0.003 0.03

Values are the mean ± SEM (the CP1563-10-HOA group: n = 80, the placebo group: n = 83). The p values were calculated by Student’s t-test and adjusted using the false discovery rate (FDR) method. FDR-adjusted p values (q values) are listed.