Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 16;9:3. doi: 10.1186/s40164-020-00160-8

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies

Author, year Intervention (dose, schedule) Comparison (description) Patients (N) Age (years) Male (%) Cytogenetic risk group, N (%) ECOG score Bone marrow blasts, median (range) Follow-up (months)
Azacitidine
 Fenaux et al. [15] Azacitidine: subcutaneously 75 mg/m2/day for 7 days Q28 days for at least 6 cycles CCR (BSC, LDAC 20 mg/m2/day for 14 days Q28 days for at least 6 cycles, IC)

Intervention: 55

Comparison: 58

Intervention: 73 (64–89)

Comparison: 73 (64–91)

Intervention: 62.1

Comparison: 56.6

Intermediate: 81 (71.7%)

Normal: 52 (46.0%)

Poor risk: 27 (23.9%)

Missing: 5 (4.4%)

0–1: 107 (94.7%)

2: 4 (3.5%)

Missing: 2 (1.8%)

Intervention: 23.0 (20.0–34.0)

Comparison: 23.1 (13.0–68.9)

40
 Dombret et al. [16] Azacitidine: subcutaneously 75 mg/m2/day for 7 days Q28 days for at least 6 cycles CCR (BSC, LDAC 20 mg/m2/day for 14 days Q28 days for at least 6 cycles, IC)

Intervention: 241

Comparison: 247

Intervention: 75 (64–91)

Comparison: 75 (65–89)

Intervention: 57.7

Comparison: 60.3

Intermediate: 306 (63.1%)

Normal: –

Poor risk: 174 (35.8%)

Missing: –

0-1: 375(76.8%)

2: 113(23.2%)

missing:–

Intervention: 70.0 (2.0–100.0)

Comparison: 72.0 (2.0–100.0)

> 50%: 366 (75.0%)

40
Decitabine
 Kantarjian et al. [17] Decitabine: intravenously 20 mg/m2 QD for 5 days, every 4 weeks TC (supportive care,or cytarabine 20 mg/m2 QD for 10 days, every 4 weeks)

Intervention: 242

Comparison: 243

Intervention: 73 (64–89)

Comparison: 73 (64–91)

Intervention: 62.1

Comparison: 56.6

Intermediate: 306 (63.1%)

Normal: –

Poor risk: 174 (35.8%)

Missing: –

0–1: 367 (75.7%)

2: 118 (24.3%)

Missing: –

20–30%: 123 (25.2%)

> 30–50%: 141 (29.3%)

> 50%: 206 (42.7%)

36

CCR conventional care regimens, BSC best supportive care, LDAC low-dose ara-c, IC induction chemotherapy, TC treatment choice, N total number of patients, ECOG Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status