Skip to main content
. 2020 Jan 29;10(2):239. doi: 10.3390/nano10020239

Table 1.

Nomenclature, experimental conditions of the electrochemical synthesis, and characteristics of the different EGO samples.

Sample Voltage Time I Time II H2SO4 C/O OEDX ID/IG d 001 t
I/II (V) (min) (s) (wt%) Ratio (%) Ratio (nm) (nm)
GO* _ _ _ _ 2.25 31.00 1.04 0.8615 13.8
EGO 1 1.0/10 10 60 65 2.09 33.12 0.41 0.8816 12.1
EGO 2 1.0/10 10 120 65 1.98 35.41 0.47 0.8956 10.7
EGO 3 1.0/20 10 30 98 1.72 40.12 1.01 0.9034 7.14
EGO 4 1.0/20 10 60 40 1.91 36.11 0.59 0.9135 9.13
EGO 5 1.0/20 10 60 65 1.79 38.33 0.70 0.9145 7.11
EGO 6 1.0/20 10 60 98 1.54 44.80 1.37 0.9187 3.98
EGO 7 1.0/30 30 60 40 2.32 29.76 0.43 0.8594 14.4
EGO 8 1.0/30 30 120 65 2.57 26.85 0.54 0.8576 16.5
EGO 9 2.0/10 10 60 65 1.88 36.69 0.79 0.9161 8.75
EGO 10 2.0/10 10 120 65 1.81 38.40 0.69 0.9356 7.37
EGO 11 2.0/20 10 30 65 1.95 35.38 0.74 0.9021 10.2
EGO 12 2.0/20 10 30 98 1.59 43.39 1.51 0.9218 4.24
EGO 13 2.0/20 10 60 40 1.80 38.33 0.77 0.9378 7.53
EGO 14 2.0/20 10 60 65 1.67 41.31 0.87 0.9595 5.84
EGO 15 2.0/20 10 60 98 1.46 47.26 1.68 0.9230 3.79
EGO 16 2.0/20 10 120 40 1.78 38.77 0.93 0.9167 7.26
EGO 17 2.0/20 10 120 65 1.69 40.82 0.99 0.9496 5.92
EGO 18 2.0/30 10 30 65 2.49 27.71 1.22 0.8583 15.8
EGO 19 2.0/10 30 30 98 2.48 27.82 1.71 0.8472 16.0
EGO 20 2.0/20 30 120 65 2.27 30.39 1.23 0.8602 14.5
EGO 21 2.0/30 30 60 40 2.88 23.96 1.30 0.8564 18.6
EGO 22 2.0/30 30 120 65 2.96 23.31 1.39 0.8499 17.9

* Synthesized by a modified Hummers’ method. I and II refer to the intercalation and exfoliation stages, respectively. The C/O ratio has been calculated from elemental analysis measurements, the percentage of oxygen (OEDX) from EDX measurements, ID/IG is the integrated intensity ratio of the D and G peaks from the Raman spectra, t is the average flake thickness obtained from AFM measurements, and d is the interlayer spacing corresponding to the (001) reflection of GO obtained from the X-ray diffractograms.