Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD001735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5

Comparison 3. Comparisons between alternative foam supports.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Pressure ulcer incidence 5   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
1.1 Alternative foam vs standard foam 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.2 Foam mattress vs foam overlay 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.3 Solid foam vs convoluted foam 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.4 Transfoam mattress vs Transfoamwave mattress 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
1.5 Cold foam mattress vs cold foam mattress and static air overlay 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]