Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD001735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5

Lazzara 1991.

Methods RCT (allocation by random‐number tables) in elderly nursing home population with 6‐month follow‐up.
Participants Nursing home residents at risk of pressure ulcers (Norton score > 15). 9/66 subjects had pressure ulcers on entry to the study.
Interventions 1. Air‐filled (SofCare) overlay (33 randomised; 2 ulcer on admission; 10/31 developed a new one).
 2. Gel mattress (33 randomised; 7 ulcer on admission; 8/26 developed a new one).
Outcomes Grade 2 or greater ulcers:
 1. Air overlay: 16% (5/31);
 2. Gel mattress: 15% (4/26).
Notes Interventions not well described. Of the 74 who entered the study, only those who participated for 4‐6 months were included in the analysis (total of 66). 19 patients died and were excluded from the analysis, but these might be at highest risk. It was difficult to maintain inflation of the air overlay; it also punctured easily. During the trial, 110 air overlays were used for 76 patients. Gel mattress was heavy.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Random‐number table.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Pressure ulcer incidence Unclear risk Blinding not reported: “patients in both study groups were assessed by the same researcher for the presence of pressure ulcer development over areas of bony prominence”. 
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Nineteen participants died during the 6‐month study; individuals participating for 4‐6 months were included in the data analysis, although exact numbers included were not reported. 
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk All pre‐specified outcomes reported.
Free of other bias ‐ were groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators? Low risk No important baseline differences.
 
Free of other bias ‐ was the timing of the outcome assessment similar in all groups? Low risk No other concerns.