Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 3;2015(9):CD001735. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001735.pub5

Stapleton 1986.

Methods Quasi RCT: allocation by means of alternation. Duration of follow‐up unclear.
Participants Female elderly patients with fractured neck of femur, without existing pressure ulcers, Norton score 14 or less. Baseline data presented and groups well matched for age and Norton score.
Interventions 1. Large Cell Ripple (Talley) (n = 32).
 2. Polyether foam pad 2 feet x 2 feet x 3‐inch thickness (n = 34).
 3. Spenco pad (n = 34).
Outcomes Ulcers of grade 2 or greater:
 1. Large Cell Ripple: 34% (11/32);
 2. Polyether foam pad: 41% (14/34);
 3. Spenco pad: 35% (12/34).
Grade 3 and greater:
 1. Large Cell Ripple: 0% (0/32);
 2. Foam pad: 24% (8/34);
 3. Spenco pad: 6% (2/34).
Notes 45 Large Cell Ripple mattresses required 50 motor repairs and 90 material repairs during 12‐ month study. Patients did not like the feel of the ripples. No mention of withdrawals.
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Randomisation for first 2 groups, but not for subsequent groups: “patients for the first two groups were selected by lottery, and thereafter patients were allocated to each group systematically, in rotation”; total numbers for the first 2 groups were not reported.
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Not reported.
Blinding (performance bias and detection bias) 
 Pressure ulcer incidence Unclear risk Not reported.
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Out of 100 patients recruited, “two patients allocated to the Ripple pad were lost to ward transfer”.
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Unclear risk Outcomes not pre‐specified.
Free of other bias ‐ were groups similar at baseline regarding the most important prognostic indicators? Low risk No baseline differences on mean age and Norton scores (the presence of existing pressure ulcers was an exclusion criterion for the study).
Free of other bias ‐ was the timing of the outcome assessment similar in all groups? Unclear risk Inclusion criteria stated female patients only.