Table 3.
Scaffolds and fabrication techniques used for TMJ condyle regeneration.
| Scaffold Material | Fabrication technique | Experimental model | Result(s) | Cite | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic materials | PLA, PGA, PLGA | PGA fibers coated with PLA solution, Negative mold | In vitro, BMSCs | Demonstrated cellular compatibility | [169] |
| EtOH sintered PLGA particles, Freeze dried | Rabbit condyle defect, 6 weeks | Slight increase in cartilage formed over empty defect | [164] | ||
| PCL | PCL surface treated with NaOH, 3D printed | Dorsum of rats, 7 days | Supported blood vessel formation; printed entire mandible | [170] | |
| PEG | PEG hydrogel, Photocrosslinked | In vitro, TMJ chondrocytes | Mechanical strain reduced collagen I and II | [171] | |
| HA | Gas foamed HA sintered at 1200°C, Milled | Sheep condyle replacement, 16 weeks | Supported cartilage and bone formation; attachment of the TMJ disc | [172] | |
| Natural materials | Coral | Coral cleaned with NaClO, Milled | Dorsum of mice, 8 weeks | Cell seeding resulted in new hard tissue and osteocytes | [144] |
| Collagen | HA-collagen composite and collagen sponge, Milled | Clinical trial, 1 year | Greatly increased mandible range of motion and patient quality of life | [173] | |
| Chitosan | PCL-HA-chitosan composite, Freeze dried | Mechanical and chemical assessment | Mechanical properties were similar to the native condyle | [174] |