Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 13;8:e8572. doi: 10.7717/peerj.8572

Figure 3. Summary of accessions elected to conform core-1, core-2 and mini-core.

Figure 3

Summary of accessions elected to conform core-1, core-2 and mini-core collection compared with the whole tea accessions by (A) groups predicted based on cluster analysis (G1 = Group 1,G2 = Group 2, G3 = Group 3, G4 = Group 4, G5 = Group 5, G6 = Group 6 , G7 = Group 7 , G8 = Group 8, G9 = Group 9 , G10 = Group 10, G11 = Group 11, G12 = Group 12, G13 = Group 13, G14 = Group 14) ; (B) summary of accessions selected to account for core-1, core-2 and mini-core collection compared with the whole tea accessions in each group by cultivation status (AL, Ancient landraces; ML, Modern landraces; WT, Wild tree ) , by Growth Habits (CT, cultivation type; WT, wild type) and Species of origin (S1, C.sinensis; S2, C.tachangensis; S3, C.remotiserrata; S4, C.taliensis).