Skip to main content
. 2020 Feb 11;21(3):45–51. doi: 10.1002/acm2.12818

Table 4.

Comparison of the five criteria for plan quality evaluation between the treated and retrospective study plans.

Evaluation parameters Treated Plans Retrospective Study Plans Difference (%)
mGI Group Large 4.2 ± 0.3 3.1 ± 0.1 −26.0 ± 5.1
Group Small 5.2 ± 0.4 3.9 ± 0.2 −24.5 ± 2.9
V12 Group Large 15.8 ± 3.9 9.5 ± 1.9 −39.9 ± 5.9
Group Small 4.0 ± 0.5 2.6 ± 0.4 −35.0 ± 3.8
PCI Group Large 0.83 ± 0.03 0.89 ± 0.01 7.2 ± 4.4
Group Small 0.79 ± 0.02 0.88 ± 0.02 11.4 ± 4.2
HI Group Large 1.08 ± 0.01 1.34 ± 0.01 23.4 ± 1.7
Group Small 1.09 ± 0.01 1.34 ± 0.01 22.2 ± 1.3
FI Group Large 1.07 ± 0.01 1.57 ± 0.04 47.1 ± 4.0
Group Small 1.07 ± 0.01 1.60 ± 0.03 49.4 ± 3.1

PCI, Paddick conformity index.