Skip to main content
. 2020 Mar 6;20(6):1–109.

Table A2:

GRADE Evidence Profile for Comparison of 10-kHz High-Frequency SCS Versus Conventional SCS for Chronic Noncancer Pain—Randomized Controlled Trials

Number of Studies (Design) Risk of Bias Inconsistency Indirectness Imprecision Publication Bias Upgrade Considerations Quality
Pain Intensity
3 (RCTs)2830 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate
Functional Disability
3 (RCTs)2830 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate
Opioid Use
1 (RCT)28 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations Serious limitations (−1)b Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ Low
Patient Satisfaction
2 (RCTs)28,30 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate
Global Impression of Change
3 (RCTs)2830 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate
Sleep Quality
2 (RCTs)28,30 Serious limitations (−1)a No serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate
Health-Related Quality of Life
3 (RCTs)2830 Serious limitations (−1)a Serious limitations No serious limitations No serious limitations Undetected NA ⊕ ⊕ ⊕ Moderate

Abbreviations: GRADE, Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; RCT, randomized controlled trial; SCS, spinal cord stimulation.

a

Blinding of patients and investigators was not done.

b

Only one trial reported on opioid use, and doses were extremely variable.